Chat & Social > The Bar - General Chat

Tazers, yea or nay?

<< < (4/6) > >>

freelanderpx54:
Taser - YES

Armed - DEFINITELY

Shoot to kill - WHY NOT, anything else would be a waste of all that training

If a person is close enough to be tasered then the probability of them commiting the alleged crime is high enough to shoot them and remove them from society and the gene pool

lee celtic:
tazers are  8)  8)  8)

I also think the police should have special ram cars to hit joyriders headon and not get hurt  :twisted:

or the ones they have in the state with a graber on the front ,they ram the car from the back then stick the brakes on :twisted:  :twisted:

hobbit:
Absolutley, shame I cant buy one :twisted:

My father's got the best idea, bring back national service, old style that is, not the cr(rubbish) that they put on the tv

The actual training methods used in the 50's and 60's

mill2020:
Big YES to tazers,
my better half is a copper and i know i will sleep better at night knowing she is packing heat, rather than a can of police issue hairspray. The criminal element have the justice system on there side, why not give the police the tools they need to do there job and  LET them do there job. Nuff said :smack:

rollazuki:
Id say yes.

For me, if you are asked to stop by the police, or desist from your current actions and you refuse, then you lose your human/civil rights.
If the outcome then is that you get tasered,shot,beat up , then its your fault, and no reason to bleat about it.

Personally, if Im requested to stop, I stop. They ask questions, you answer them, if you were being a bad boy mebbe you get nicked, mebbe you dont, then you go. Its simple.

If I ran, I wouldnt be surprised if bad things started to happen. Id deserve it.

Tasers, definitely. Gas sprays, definitely.Guns(in moderation)

Rolla

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page