Chat & Social > The Bar - General Chat

Tazers, yea or nay?

(1/6) > >>

Evilgoat:
I see the do-gooders are at it again, apaerntly tazering is against peoples human rights and the police shouldnt use them because out of the millions of daily tazerings the US police dish out, one or two people have died from an unrelated problem.

The way I see it, when faced with a threat the police will deply a tazer where they may previously have used leathal force.

So it comes down to

Tazered, .000000001% you might die
Shot 99.9% chance you WILL die

AFAIK if you put yourself ina position to need tazering you deserve it anyhow, and i've survived 45Kv shocks at heaftier currents than that.

So, Yes or no?

Tiki Al:
YES !!!

Tazer the do-gooders 1st !!

offenders should be given one chance to comply with the police when asked to, if they don't tazer them then continue questioning when they come round  :twisted:

Cassillis:
Gets my vote

Bush Tucker Man:
The Chief Constable of North Wales Brundstrom was tasered as a demonstration, & another Chief Constable has also been filmed in the same situation.
If they're willing to go through it, why not issue them??



But, can we have them in A&E too ple-e-a-a-se?

BigBlue90:
Best bit of kit we have!!! :wink:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page