AuthorTopic: 1st prosecution  (Read 2294 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline old joe

  • Posts: 911
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
1st prosecution
« on: May 16, 2010, 17:07:50 »
Hi All

hope this hasn't been anybody on here

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/mid/8677422.stm

Dazza
Old Joe (Dazza)

The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes.

Remember each and everyone of us is gifted, it’s just that some leave the wrapping on longer than others

A Journey of a Thousand Miles begins with a Single Step.


http://www.4x4prejudice.org/

www.rsda.org.uk

http://muppets.go.com/games/muppets-flyinggonzo.html

Offline dxmedia

  • Posts: 1355
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +2/-2
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2010, 17:12:53 »
Brilliant news  :clap: :clap: :clap:
1959 Unimog 404 DoKa i6
1996 Jeep ZG i6with 6" suspension lift
1999 2.5 v6 Omega autobahn stormer
2001 1.4 Polo

Offline redhand

  • Posts: 936
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2010, 18:10:47 »
Brilliant news  :clap: :clap: :clap:

Absolutely  Few more prosecutions & the Thick Ignorant Morons will get the message. That or lose they're vehicles..  :police:
http://www.humber-yorks4x4response.org.uk/
www.landyzone.co.uk
www.landrovernet.com
www.mig-welding.co.uk

1987 TD90 Hard Top

I haven't got a clue where I'm going. But God Help Them when I get there..

Offline Saffy

  • Posts: 3127
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • The Bell Inn, Imber.
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2010, 19:25:12 »
How about the authorities do their job rather than the public doing it for them. What instruments are in place to prevent false vindictive reporting via that web form?  What effect would crafted bot net hammering on that form have - 10,000+ reports a day?
.swonk eno oN .esoht dna eseht ,siht dna taht ,wollof ot selur emos teg eW

Offline gtomo2

  • Posts: 1924
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2010, 19:28:32 »
Just hope other "groups of people that enjoy the countyside" Dont use it to try and get legal lane driving people like us done.
Mr Graeme Thomas (tomo)
300 TDi Discovery - So i can go fording
Stop laughing put the camera down AND PASS ME THE TOW ROPE !! PLEASE

Offline Disco Matt

  • Posts: 2666
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2010, 20:34:51 »
I can't help but think that it isn't a good idea to make it this simple to report people. See, at present those of us who have the knowledge and experience to recognise illegal behaviour also know exactly who to approach with evidence. The forms give every bobbly miseryguts the chance to tie up Police time and public money investigating alleged offences that turn out to be people acting lawfully.

That said, from what I've heard the Police cannot take action without photographic evidence, as otherwise it's one person's word against another's. If they say that photos/videos need to clearly show the alleged offenders behaving illegally and with enough of the background to positively identify the location then it cuts the chances of malicious reports dramatically.

I am not impressed with the idea of "hotlines" as they will attract nuisance callers such as the sort who buy a house on a ROW and then waste thousands of pounds of council money by waging a one-person campaign to have it closed. By all means use them to work out where your next sting should be, but if you're getting lots of reports from one phone number then it's more likely to be NIMBY than a serious problem!
1996 Discovery 300TDI. She's got it where it counts...

Offline redhand

  • Posts: 936
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2010, 20:39:03 »
I don't see the problem with it. It isn't any different from the Crimewatch hotline. At the end of the day if you're trespassing or driving on land not forming part of a public highway. Then you deserve to lose your motor.
http://www.humber-yorks4x4response.org.uk/
www.landyzone.co.uk
www.landrovernet.com
www.mig-welding.co.uk

1987 TD90 Hard Top

I haven't got a clue where I'm going. But God Help Them when I get there..

Offline Bob696

  • Posts: 1697
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #7 on: May 17, 2010, 06:53:17 »
It was 3 trial bikes on Sarn Helen. A road that many of us drove pre NERC. It was criminal for the government to remove that right.
"A wise man has something to say a fool has to say something"
"Think of it as evolution in action" and yes, I do know that I can't spell thank you.
200TDi 90  "Daisy" A.K.A. "Baby"
3.5L V8 110 "Sally". The camper van with an attitude problem.

LABOUR
Lying Arrogant Blair Oppressors of UK Rights

Offline carbore

  • Posts: 1082
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #8 on: May 17, 2010, 09:06:46 »
I saw someone walking thier dog, playing fetch with it across a newley plated potato field (just coming out, now flattened)

Is there a hotline or form for that?
CORNISH SPRINT AND HILLCLIMB CHAMPION 2009

Lotus Elise (Tuned/lightened for sprint racing Championship winner 2009)
Freelander 1 TD4 Auto AKA the Big Black Bus (Brownchurch Roof Rack, Hatch Bag rear liner)
Ferguson T20 "Grey Fergie" TVO Tractor 1951

Offline Lumbering Jack

  • Posts: 190
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #9 on: May 17, 2010, 09:15:08 »
I saw someone walking thier dog, playing fetch with it across a newley plated potato field (just coming out, now flattened)

Is there a hotline or form for that?

No - but there should be
R reg 3.9 Discovery on LPG - pretty standard at mo.

Offline lurch_917

  • Posts: 672
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-1
  • hi all hows it going
    • kettering
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2010, 15:17:02 »
so i take it from this that sarn helen is now a no go area ?? then why do some big named clubs still run trips round there ??
As a youth I could run up and down stairs all day now I'm older it takes me all day just to walk upstairs

Offline Bob696

  • Posts: 1697
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2010, 16:16:53 »
so i take it from this that sarn helen is now a no go area ?? then why do some big named clubs still run trips round there ??

About 1/3rd is a BOAT (with seasonal TRO). Other sections are now restricted Byway (Ex RUPP) but are also on the list of streets and are hence duel status so it is another 'grey route' that NERC created. Some say you can and some say you can't. Legal minefield.
"A wise man has something to say a fool has to say something"
"Think of it as evolution in action" and yes, I do know that I can't spell thank you.
200TDi 90  "Daisy" A.K.A. "Baby"
3.5L V8 110 "Sally". The camper van with an attitude problem.

LABOUR
Lying Arrogant Blair Oppressors of UK Rights

Offline gtomo2

  • Posts: 1924
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2010, 17:22:14 »
Still think that the police will end up getting fed up with trying to sort out all the pics to find out if its a legel lane or not as you know how good some of the bobble hat brigade are at map reading When they stop you and ask why you are driving on a footpath  :roll:
Mr Graeme Thomas (tomo)
300 TDi Discovery - So i can go fording
Stop laughing put the camera down AND PASS ME THE TOW ROPE !! PLEASE

Offline lambert

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 2137
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +1/-0
  • and then as if by magic
    • harrogate
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #13 on: May 17, 2010, 18:47:29 »
just a thought, could one get legal aid to defend this action by dint of proving the illigality of the redesignation of the byway to 'restricted' e.g. an infringement of ones human rights under the right to roam act?

possibly?
Lambert Coverdale.

As slow as possible, as fast as necessary.

Two and a half litres of turbocharged diesel goodness.

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 1st prosecution
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2010, 00:33:19 »
Just a thought, well ppipe dream really but our lovely shiney new gov't has suggested that we can nominate stoopid acts passed under the liebour gov't to have repealed.

I think they are trying to get a cheap referendum on fox hunting which they promised to repeal and may now not want to, but would it work on NERC?
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal