AuthorTopic: 3.5 not very well after deep water  (Read 1972 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pete5844 as was

  • Posts: 98
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
3.5 not very well after deep water
« on: March 21, 2008, 12:23:06 »
Hi all got a 3.5 efi that was running fine till it met very deep water,now it ticks over fine but when you rev it it sounds to be running on 7 and is well short of power,have changed the plugs/leads/arm and dizzy cap.Any ideas would be welcome.Cheers Pete

Offline Skibum346

  • Posts: 1975
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • T. A. N. S. T. A. A. F. L.
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 3.5 not very well after deep water
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2008, 12:40:17 »
Couple of questions...

Do you have a snorkel?
Is it properly sealed?
Did the ECU get wet?

If you have no snorkel, or you do but it leaks (what's the ***** point of having it then?!) there is a chance you've sucked water up and hydrolocked the engine. That said I wouldn't have expected it to be just one cylinder.

If the ECU got wet it may not be performing as it should, but again, I would have expected that to affect the whole engine rather than a single cylinder.

Now that the bad news is out of the way, make sure none of your HT leads are shorting against anything... and if you haven't changed them in a while... get a GOOD set.

Good luck.

Offline Pete5844 as was

  • Posts: 98
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 3.5 not very well after deep water
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2008, 13:26:19 »

Snorkel good and sealed and have moved the ecu so that stayed dry.Had to bring it home on a trailer,lots of wd40  and  left the dizzy cap off for a day or 2  to get it started but won't run right.Pete

Offline jjsaul

  • Posts: 1534
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Leeds, West Yorks
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 3.5 not very well after deep water
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2008, 16:51:29 »
if you havent replaced the dizzy cap after you drowned it, it may have small cracks in it

am thinking what else it could be....mine did that a few times then seemed to cure itself...and i dont have a snorkel or have moved the ecu  :roll:
James

...lovin dirty days out...

1983 OneTen V8 Station Wagon 3.5 (LPG)
1972 Range Rover V8
1992 Range Rover 4.6 (LPG)
1978 Range Rover Carmichael Commando 6x4
1972 Range Rover - Major project, FOR SALE
1976 Range Rover - Less of a project, FOR SALE
Previously: Range Rovers 1988, 1990 and others...
2005 Volvo V70 T5 SE (LPG) - daily driver


Offline Pete5844 as was

  • Posts: 98
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 3.5 not very well after deep water
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2008, 17:24:22 »
Am gona try a new coil(will have a look on paddock for one)Just hope it's not the dizzy itself.Pete

Offline hairyasswelder

  • Posts: 1351
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • It's gonna cost ya
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 3.5 not very well after deep water
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2008, 19:34:35 »
Am gona try a new coil(will have a look on paddock for one)Just hope it's not the dizzy itself.Pete

Why a new coil if it is running 7 cylinders?? pull the lead off on the dizzy end and check the spark against the block

Do you have access to any known good spares that you can borrow to test it?


'88 RR 3.5 efi, an on going project :o) evolving daily/slowly

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 3.5 not very well after deep water
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2008, 03:31:52 »
Mine did a coil when I drowned it, though it didn't sound like it was running on 7, though TBH when they are running on 7 they don't sound any different so it's more likley running on 5 if it's that bad.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

Offline Pete5844 as was

  • Posts: 98
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 3.5 not very well after deep water
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2008, 10:58:32 »
No got no access to spares(may have rebuilt it by the time I've finished).Checked the spark then checked the spark on an old ford the rangie one looks very weak in comparison.Pete

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 3.5 not very well after deep water
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2008, 03:02:13 »
Is the spark yellowy or blue? yellow=not good
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

Offline Reggieroo

  • Posts: 259
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Nr Pershore, Worcestershire
  • Referrals: 0
Re: 3.5 not very well after deep water
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2008, 13:21:18 »
The same thing happened to mine in deep water, it totally cut out, flooded the interior & it never ran on petrol again........ :'(

There are two small breather holes in the bottom of the dizzy that let the water in, that may have caused the damage.

You need to modify the dizzy with some breather pipes along with the other mods if you like wading.
1993 3.9 V8 Range Rover Classic
Audi 4.2 V8 S6 Quattro

For a taste of Ireland delivered direct to your door www.theirishshop.co.uk

My 4x4 websites.
www.offroad4x4s.com
www.offroadrangerovers.com
www.offroadlandrovers.com

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal