AuthorTopic: Diff.ratios in relation to tyre size-or vice versa  (Read 1242 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Roc'N'Roll

  • Posts: 47
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Diff.ratios in relation to tyre size-or vice versa
« on: March 14, 2008, 15:48:25 »
Eggheads needed!!! :)
Just found out my diff.ratios are 4.874 and not 4.3 :) :) :)
I bought 31" muds but now want to get either 33s or 35s
Question- sure can manage 33s but will engine torque/diff.ratio handle 35s?
Engine is 2.2 diesel non-turbo 47 Kw DIN/HP 64@4000rpm
Is there a math equation?
Help anybody??
Also do I get fat 12.5- or thinner 10.5?
Any help appreciated :D
JESUS LOVES YOU!!
 (Everybody else thinks your a Muppet! )

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Diff.ratios in relation to tyre size-or vice versa
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2008, 18:09:25 »
Depends how much spare power you think you have.  It's not a simple matter of doing the maths on the rolling radius (diameter) of the tyre and comparing final drive ratios, the bigger tyres also take more turning and can lead to very poor on-road performance and pretty dire off road too once the rims are full of mud.

It's why sports cars have low profile alloy wheels, to limit the amountof mass they have to spin up.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal