Forum back online. Please post!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
hi when i put mine on it was higher at the front with the longer ones on the back :doh:( sounds odd i no) so swapped them around now all fine. :clap: so all down to thickness not length.
but the rear is nearly two inches higher than the front but a couple of people have suggested that when i put the rear seats back in it will sit normal but im not convinced the seats are heavy enough to make a difference
There are 3 equally important measurements that determenting the compressed height (ride height). They are free length, the rate (how stiff it is) and the load on the spring.A short but stiff spring can give the same or evan a higher ride hight than a long soft spring for the same load.Give the lengths you mention, my guess is that they are blue, made?/distrobuted by Bearmach and are BA2102 and BA2104http://www.bearmach.com/acatalog/Disco%20Pages.pdfSee page 12 for their full specificationOne question, are the coils equally spaced on you lift springs? If so then the rate should be constant, if they are not and some coils are closer together than others then the springs are most likely variable rate, which makes it more difficult to make accurate predictions of ride height.If you can, with the springs still on your discovery measure the compressed length of all 4 springs, from this it should be possible to work out the sprung weigth on each spring and determine what rate and length of spring is needed give the desired ride height.
I should think you have them on the right way round*, its just the rear springss you have selected are too long and stiff compare to the front springs to give a balanced ride height. Easiest solution is to do like a friend and just put a large oil cooled welder in the back, which will weight it down nicely.
you are the spring king [-o<
:lol: where ever did you find that pic