AuthorTopic: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?  (Read 947 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline auf_wiedersehen_pet

  • Posts: 1179
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« on: January 28, 2008, 20:12:15 »
Just got some new rear shocks (thanks to bensonsnuts).

The question is........

Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?

 :P I've already got a mint set of boots on the Pro Comps that are coming off so money is not an issue.
 :P For looks, a shiny rod is so much better that a floppy rubber (Ooh err missus).

The question is focused on the durability/longevity. Will the rod rust prematurely or will the action of the shock wipe it clean during use?
Rob Steele

1995 Land Rover Discovery 300 TDi - Everyday Car (Ex Jap)
2007 Toyota Avensis 2.2 T-180 - Sensible Car (Ex TSB Bank)

Offline solihull-mick

  • Posts: 986
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2008, 20:23:42 »
Good question, ive fitted many sets of pro comps, and allways fitted the boots, but in the heat of battle they do tend to pull the boot off the shocker body, mine still come off after glueing them on, i rekon you would be fine with no boots, wont fail the test for that, shocker has a wiper seal on the piston, shocker shaft is made from stainless so wont rust, i guess you woulkd be fine with out, :grin:
300 TDI Commercial Disco, ( Recovery & Parts Hack )
Series 2A Hybrid TDI( Bessie)
Mk1 escort RS2000 (my baby)
MK6 Fiesta Zetec s (wife gets the brand new car)

Offline auf_wiedersehen_pet

  • Posts: 1179
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2008, 20:50:02 »
Many thanks for the answer Mick.

Forgot to say that my shock boots are ofetn full of dirty brown sludgy water when I lift them slightly. Can't be good holdng all of that water.

 :off topic: Loving the rebuild mate - worth every minute. :off topic:
Rob Steele

1995 Land Rover Discovery 300 TDi - Everyday Car (Ex Jap)
2007 Toyota Avensis 2.2 T-180 - Sensible Car (Ex TSB Bank)

Offline Disco-Ron

  • Posts: 1048
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2008, 23:30:41 »
What about fitting them to the top of the shock, but not pushing them onto the body of the shock itself.... that way they keep most of the crap out, but can still let the water n crap out aswell!!
gone from 200tdi.... to 300tdi... still with loads done to it, in fact, even more than the last truck...LOL!!!

Wolfie

  • Guest
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2008, 23:38:35 »
I didn't bother at all when I fitted the 8 that Mathilda wears and they seem to be holding up OK*, but she doesn't do many miles, but she has procomps as they are as close to disposable as you can get.

A few people recently have commented that they fit them, but cut to lenght so that they cover the rod when at rest but will allow all the muck to flow out, and have had good results.

*apart from the front set of rear shocks which look as if a team of demented elves have attacked the bodies of the shocks with their hammers.

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2008, 03:46:28 »
Pistons are NOT made from stainless, pistons on ProComps get chipped and go rusty, destroying the wiper seal and causing leaks.

Fit the boots but don'e secure them to the body, better still cut the boots in half and fit just enough for the piston to be covered when the car is at rest, that way they don't collect muck inside them but do protect the piston from stone chips.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

Offline solihull-mick

  • Posts: 986
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2008, 20:49:35 »
what ever :roll:
300 TDI Commercial Disco, ( Recovery & Parts Hack )
Series 2A Hybrid TDI( Bessie)
Mk1 escort RS2000 (my baby)
MK6 Fiesta Zetec s (wife gets the brand new car)

Offline L90OOK

  • Posts: 1252
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • Somerset
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2008, 17:40:05 »
Pro Comps are made with Chrome hardened steel pistons which is why, if chipped, go rusty  :cool:
Did everyone see that?  Because I will NOT be doing it again!

 

Offline boss

  • Posts: 1634
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +2/-0
  • "steerings a little loose!"
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2008, 17:47:12 »
thought the salt they spread on the roads this time of year doesnt do the chrome anygood either.

"the young disco chopping maniac" -disco_stu!
www.artoffroad.com

bossFAB - stickers avalable

Offline Steve ray

  • Posts: 893
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #9 on: January 30, 2008, 18:04:48 »
fit 'em (fixed at the top) but "loose" at the bottom so all the muck n water can drain out!

Sponsor us for the 2010 MAC 4x4 UK Challenge (5-7 March) www.justgiving.com/teambofa4x42011


Offline Disco_Stu

  • Posts: 402
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Any chance of a tow...?
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #10 on: January 30, 2008, 18:33:06 »
I cable tied a set on mine and hey presto - rusty shocks. Took the rubbers off completely and no probs.

The best way is probably what has been stated above, fit the rubbers but make sure they can drain.

stu.
1994 300Tdi Disco    


Snorkel now complete.... http://forum.difflock.com/viewtopic.php?t=1906&highlight=



Offline clbarclay

  • Posts: 1615
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #11 on: January 30, 2008, 20:53:25 »
I was running without, but the shafts on the rear dampers were starting to suffer (scratches and the odd chip in the chrome) so now running half height boots.
I would sooner not have the concertina type of boot as when the compress the end up limiting the movement of the damper so you don't get full travel and can turn it into a bump stop which is not good.
Chris

Various range rovers from 1986 to 1988 in various states
Locost sports car based on mk2 escort - currently working on brakes, fuel and wiring

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #12 on: February 01, 2008, 15:52:35 »
thought the salt they spread on the roads this time of year doesnt do the chrome anygood either.

That reminds me, I'm told that our local authority (amongst others) isn't using salt as such anymore but a food-related additive instead.

The result is that the roads get sticky/slippery when the dew forms, this is causing more accidents though it is effective in snow.

So if your roads have been gritted, be extra careful.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

Offline Budgie

  • Regional Rep
  • *
  • Posts: 2217
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • This post is best viewed on a computer.
    • Lochaber
  • Referrals: 0
Re: Shock Boots or no Shock Boots?
« Reply #13 on: February 04, 2008, 11:06:07 »
I've had them both with andwithout boots and for mostly on-road then I would say go with the boots because I don't have boots on them now and tops of the shockers are as rusty as hell.
So went I get round to fitting new ones the boots will be going back on. Whether I secure them at the bottom or not I've not decided yet.  ;)

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal