AuthorTopic: parabolics which shocks?  (Read 902 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline piper5

  • Posts: 54
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
parabolics which shocks?
« on: December 26, 2007, 19:37:03 »
my series 3 has parabolics and procomp shocks, the shocks are now knackered can i use standard or do i need longer ones, i don't know if the procomps are longer or not they came as a kit years ago any suggestions welcome

Offline lightweight-love

  • Posts: 403
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
parabolics which shocks?
« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2007, 20:54:11 »
yeh u do need longer shocks than standard, longer on rear usually!
iv got 322546 's on rear and 318546 's on front, 2nd 3rd and 4th numbers is extended length so 322546 is 22.5 inches fully extended.
paddocks do ok price for them! aparently u can fit rear standard shocks from a 109" on front as cheaper option!? dunno if right tho!
Hope this helps, merry Boxing day!
1975 s111 lightweight 200tdi, paras, snorkel, winch... My everyday ride
1976 s111 lightweight stock new restoration project :)
1974 s111 Long term restoration project, galv chassis, paras...
"she's not leaking oil, she's marking her territory"

Offline Range Rover Blues

  • Moderator
  • ***
  • Posts: 15218
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • South Yorkshire
  • Referrals: 0
Re: parabolics which shocks?
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2008, 04:27:34 »
You probably want uprated shocks as the parabolics won't be self-damping like the old multi-leaves would be.
Blue,  1988  Range Rover 3.5 EFi with plenty of toys bolted on
Chuggaboom, 1995 Range Rover Classic
1995 Range Rover Classic Vogue LSE with 5 big sticks of Blackpool rock under the bonnet.

Offline Lucy1978

  • Posts: 516
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: parabolics which shocks?
« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2008, 12:51:42 »
I'm running on my original shocks and have had no problems at all.

Offline S188

  • Posts: 189
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: parabolics which shocks?
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2008, 01:38:53 »
Procomps use a code to tell you what they are, 1000, 3000, 9000 are how good/hard they are at damping.  Used to have ES9000's (gas dampers) on my dads truck but they were a bit hard, ride not much better than leafs.  Now we run ES1000's (oil I think) and it rides very nice.  The ES letters mean they are extended shocks.

The only real merit of extended ones is they'll give you more axle travel - with paras its not hard to get to the limit of a normal length shock, longer shocks alow it to keep going a bit further - remember to ajust the check straps too so you can use the extra length.  Some people dont run check straps, personly I don't think its a good idea as the shocks and chassis mountings were not designed to be limiting the axle articulation, just to damp it.  The argument that they reduice axle articulation isn't really valid as when setup properly are practically the same length as the shocks limit.  The strong articulation limits are the bumpstops and checkstraps which can take a hammering if you offroad hard.  If you don't have checkstraps it might even be a factor to your original shocks breaking.  Front springs ofcourse dont have straps but don't need them as they don't articulate too much for vereous resions.
Glen
1956 88" Station Wagon
1992 VW Transporter Syncro
19** assorted broken machinery

Offline Saffy

  • Posts: 3127
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • The Bell Inn, Imber.
  • Referrals: 0
Re: parabolics which shocks?
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2008, 18:55:23 »
I run my series with standard but heavy duty shocks (which are fatter) with parabolics without issue. Year of motorway use, Wiltshire roads and hard greenlaning, got bored with checking if where knackered yet like a few people said they would be, didn't even get warm.
.swonk eno oN .esoht dna eseht ,siht dna taht ,wollof ot selur emos teg eW

Offline Bowie

  • Posts: 204
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
Re: parabolics which shocks?
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2008, 00:05:27 »
Yep, the HD ones should last a lot longer, as they are designed with the HD springs used in the military.... for an even harder, bumpier ride  :clap:
1980 SIII Lightweight 2.25 Petrol - completely standard.
1991 Range Rover Vogue SE 3.9 V8 - now on LPG (sorted!), 2" lift, mud tyres, and more to come...

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal