AuthorTopic: zuke  (Read 1528 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

the loon

  • Guest
zuke
« on: September 13, 2005, 21:17:37 »
Looking to buy a second hand zuke as replacemnet for family car
Does anyone have any idear what sort of road tax costs are involved cost to insure etc in comparison to a 90

Offline jimny gary

  • Posts: 180
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
zuke
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2005, 21:33:56 »
my jimnys £150 a year road tax cos its crap on emissions. 35 to the gallon with my mud terrains on.
www.4x4Recovery.com  - Sensibly priced recovery gear

Jimny, 6:1 lobster box, rear discs etc

Offline robbie

  • Posts: 1327
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
zuke
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2005, 23:41:14 »
with regaard to the insurance, we pay less for the 90 than we did for a Suzuki Samurai, which I think is a group 6, the same as the Jimny.

Cant work it out but it is with the National Farmers Union
If I could only find some mud to play in, I would be as happy as the preverbial pig!!!

http://members.mud-club.com/profiles/robbie/gallery/
http://www.mudpics.co.uk/gallery/index.php

1985 Land Rover 90 being worked on for French plates soon
2002 Peugeot 406 GLX Estate - more economic then the Disco, but not as much fun :(
2005 Toyota Yaris T3 - new driving school car

Offline jimny gary

  • Posts: 180
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
zuke
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2005, 08:27:37 »
I pay 275 as a modified vehicle, was 300 insured as standard
www.4x4Recovery.com  - Sensibly priced recovery gear

Jimny, 6:1 lobster box, rear discs etc

Offline jims jimny

  • Posts: 121
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
zuke
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2005, 18:48:03 »
just insured mine 238 as a modified (adrian flux )
 
 338 as standard (robin sods )
mods so far  2"procomp suspension  
205/75/15 colway mt
diff breathers
t-case protection plate
snorkel/piper cross filter + loads more

Offline LandRoger

  • Regional Rep
  • *
  • Posts: 1759
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • Salisbury Plain Wilts.
  • Referrals: 0
zuke
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2005, 21:29:22 »
My Jimny  is group 6  220  modified , 30mpg  -on 215/80/15 muds  r/tax 120   ,  i think the land/rover 90 is cheaper to insure because it can be got on classic insurance as most are over 20 yrs old + they are cheap to repair,
K.I.S.S. Keep It  Simple Stupid          
I am not a complete IDIOT !! have no right thumb,
1961.Series 2 v8  + 03 Vitara SWB.
MG Midget 2,0L Pinto 1973  (swifty).

Offline winchman

  • Posts: 1038
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
zuke
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2005, 21:32:23 »
£111 Pete Best radically modded, limited milage, second car
Bits in general are far cheaper than Land Rovers, you can get a compleate runner for £100.
Remember it will come in handy even if you never use it

Offline Foden34ke12

  • Posts: 81
  • Attack: 100
    Defense: 100
    Attack Member
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Referrals: 0
zuke
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2005, 10:37:36 »
90's are lower insurance because they are mostly hard top (harder to nick). They are also the official encap safest car on the road. However, like the others have said sj's are easy to work on, cheap to run (low tax for 1.3 l engine etc). Soft top SJ's stupidly easy to steal so worth getting a steering lock etc.

Part are extremely cheap even new provided you avoid suzuki dealers like you would the plague.

Hope thats helps

Dave

 






SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal