Vehicle & Technical > Discovery

disco or rangie?

<< < (2/3) > >>

auf_wiedersehen_pet:
Like many of us, I've had both.

For RRC
 :lol: No need to "camel cut" the rear arches.
 :lol: Loads of 2nd hand parts available because they are all getting chopped.
 :lol: Classic looks.

For Disco
 :lol: Slightly newer so less rot.
 :lol: Loads of new parts/mods available.
 :lol: Newer looks.

Otherwise - same animal!

Range Rover Blues:
Range rovers have more toys, at the limit the RRCis more capable becauseit's lighter and has a lower C og G , the roof of the Disco is steel and hiogher up (with 2 large chunks of glass in it).  If you want 7 seats get a Disco.

Other thanthat they are the same beast, the 300 TDi equates to a soft dash RRC, if you get a later one with EAS then you needn't worry about lifting it, it happens at the touch of a button.

hairyasswelder:

--- Quote from: auf_wiedersehen_pet on November 24, 2008, 18:19:14 ---
For Disco
 :lol: Slightly newer so less rot.


--- End quote ---

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: hmmmmm debatable  :-k :-k

Mine is a V8 classic Rangie and had all the luxuries, leather aircon, electric everything etc. At 6'3" I have no problems. It is an auto too.

All the toys for the disco fit the rangie so it is just a matter of preference.

TDi.Si:
I chose a Disco because a 200TDi was cheaper and more common in my price range! I do prefer the looks, but that didn't matter to me that much.

auf_wiedersehen_pet:

--- Quote from: hairyasswelder on November 24, 2008, 18:36:33 ---
--- Quote from: auf_wiedersehen_pet on November 24, 2008, 18:19:14 ---
For Disco
 :lol: Slightly newer so less rot.

--- End quote ---

--- End quote ---

I know....

I'm thinking RRCs are 38-13 (ish) years old and D1s are 18-10 (ish) years old.I'm sure there are numerous RRCs with less rot than newer Discos.

Have I opened a can of tin worms?

 :lol:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page