Chat & Social > The Bar - General Chat

Fuelly Conomy

(1/2) > >>

thermidorthelobster:
I took the truck into work for the last couple of days to publicise the Iceland trip I'm planning.

Got the usual "gas-guzzling" comments;  which made me think.

Assuming I get as low as 22mpg on the Iceland trip, then with me and 6 passengers I'm getting the equivalent of 154 passenger miles per gallon.

Compared that to going by moped, which I'm sure wouldn't raise any green complaints, and it's a pretty good rate - at least 50% more efficient.

The FAA estimate jet aeroplane economy as around 48 passenger miles per gallon, so it's also 3 times less polluting than flying the kids out there.

I'm getting quite quick to put people right when they make ill-informed comments, so I guess it's an educational tool after all.

V8MoneyPit:
Nice one. I trust the aforementioned ill informed are no longer so.  :D

thermidorthelobster:
This month's New Scientist points out that eating a bowl of breakfast cereal is responsible for about the same greenhouse gas emissions as driving 7km in your SUV.  Given I don't eat breakfast, that means I'm carbon-offsetting when I take it into school!

waveydavey:

--- Quote from: thermidorthelobster on September 20, 2008, 09:16:28 ---The FAA estimate jet aeroplane economy as around 48 passenger miles per gallon, so it's also 3 times less polluting than flying the kids out there.

--- End quote ---

Do you have a reference for that one at all? I would love to be able to use it but need to be able to justify it.

I worked out the Pax Mpg for QM2 - 1554! I can defend that as I have the figures so a  direct aircraft comparison would be very good.

thermidorthelobster:
I got it here, but I can't see a link to an original source.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version