Chat & Social > The Bar - General Chat
F1 - Biased or what
davidlandy:
well said
no more shell or vodafone for me
i thought that the general idea was racing
they said nothing about kimi weaving squeezing Lewis off the track in the first place or weaving like a loon to keep him behind.
carbore:
I did hear that it was not Ferrari that Appealed, it was someone who raised the issue and then asked Ferrari to comment. Like the person who thought about moving McLarend down the pit lane due to no points last year and then asked the teams to second it... I wonder who....,
Range Rover Blues:
I think it sucks. Whenever there is a stewards decision it always goes in favour of ferrari, then they try and tell us there is no bias =; what about Kimi's weaving at the end of that straight? that's a clear violation of the rules [-X. Well the ones that apply to 9 out of 10 teams anyway.
2 weeks ago in F2 there was a similar pitlane incident right before the F1 and the driver was penalised, ferrari do it 2 hours later and nothing happens.
I think Ron should try painting his cars red, maybe that might level the playing field.
Disco Matt:
--- Quote from: davidlandy on September 08, 2008, 09:56:52 ---well said
no more shell or vodafone for me
i thought that the general idea was racing
they said nothing about kimi weaving squeezing Lewis off the track in the first place or weaving like a loon to keep him behind.
--- End quote ---
I'm pretty sure Vodafone sponsor Mclaren, not Ferrari!
Ferrari don't seem to have much in the way of sponsorship on the cars of late. Not buying any Fiat group products might be a good one though...
davidlandy:
I thought that vodafone sponsored Mclaren, oops :oops:
Right - Im not gonna buy a ferrari, ever
thats a commitment I know I can keep.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version