Vehicle & Technical > Mitsubishi

paj V 90

<< < (8/16) > >>

mad geordie:
yes you did lol but i have spent a few quid and coming back up wor kid!
i did say it beats sum 90 and doesnt others yours just had to be the bloody other lol
see you in drumclog wor kid and fetch your rope ( make sure you tie it to ya front) lol

chrisland:
i say sell the 90 and get a paj.
the paj is more relaible,better to drive,cheeper to buy,
90s are to much money for what they are,,unrelaible,and they rust(rot)like mad
 :D

Suvvey:
Biggest problem with the paj is snobbery. Not only from the green oval brigade but the public.
EXAMPLE: Group of walkers are passed by a couple of 'tricked up' and battered Landies on a lane somewhere and they don't batter an eyelid. Do the same in a 'tricked' or even a standard Paj and it seems to stick out a mile :evil:

I drive a 90 for work and have a Paj for myself. Both have a long list of pro's and cons but when it comes down to reliability, comfort and value for money the paj always comes out on top in my mind.

Put a standard paj aganst a standard landy with the same tyres and I doubt there will be much difference between the two's offroad capability. The landy's much better front articulation can easily be canceled out by the paj having either a limited slip or locking rear diff as standard :wink:

Tommo:
its an interesting one indeed. in theory i would have the paj. in practice the 90. Lets not forget lady depreciation. buy a 90 with no mot, get it through a test, do some sensible mods and your money is secure. im not certain but i think by jacking up a paj you might de value it!

Suvvey:
Ahhh but if you only paid half or even less for your paj compared to a similar plated landy AND you get climate control, heated leather seats, an engine that will get you home and a chassis that isn't full of holes, can't you afford to loose a few pounds in depreciation?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page