Chat & Social > The Bar - General Chat

Insured or not insured…that is the question!

<< < (2/15) > >>

L90OOK:
No the car needs to be insured.  If you are insured to drive another car third party under your insurance then I am sure that car can't be registered to you, & needs to be insured seperately too.  Stops people owning 100's of vehicles & only one insurance policy.

BigSi:
I think the land is owned by the Council (minor road on one side, main road sweeping around the front, with hedge behind). I really can’t justify insuring it as the insurance company want £400, as my NCD is now on the Land Rover.

AF told me that unless the vehicle was insured, it can’t be driven on the public highway, no mater what insurance I have (even though I own both vehicles).

So does this mean that nobody can take it for a test drive?  :?  :?  :?  :?

Yoshi:
The problem is, reading through the insurance policy i have here, it states nothing about the other vehicle being insured.  It just says it cant be owned by or hired to the driver.  Which means you can drive it on the road, but once the driver leaves the vehicle parked up anywhere on a public highway it becomes illegal.

So by reading that ii should think as long as the other person is driving it for a test drive then all should be fine??

Oh, council owned land is public land thus means it would need insuring to park there.

Sider:
Wasn't there some exception applying to the compulsory road testing in the case of sale or some malarkey like that???

Bunnie:
the allowed to drive another vechicle bit on your insurance is no longer a standard thing. who ever is driving the car other than the insured would need to check that there policy allows this.

i used to have the ability to drive other cars when the zuki was insured but i dont get that ability with puggys insurance.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page