Chat & Social > The Bar - General Chat

Fascist Stae strikes again....

<< < (5/6) > >>

att:

--- Quote from: "Sider" ---You misunderstand me. I do not approve or disapprove of the government policies. More often than not, said policies are there, like them or not. If you don't, stand for office and get them changed. If you are not willing to do so, or like many others claim "I don't vote, 'cause it is useless" you have but one reasonable cause of action.

What I strongly object to is being branded fascist, even if by association, by the first Hitler wannabe who happens to walk past the shop. If that concept is too complicated for you to understand, maybe you should seek help. If you want to insult, go visit other forums where people are readily available to accept slander, and they may even take it as part of their "macho", "anarchist", "revisionist", "**add your preferred -ism here" glorification process.
--- End quote ---


I can actually say, with some professionalism, that it is yourself who is in need of, as you say "help"......That is most definately my very costly, educated and experienced opinion.......Go figure...

Karen696:
Mmmmm, this raises a few interesting points - does that mean they (the government) will undertake to make the house 'fit' for rental?  Will they okay it with the mortgage company - who can refuse you permission to rent it (often a reason why the house is empty) and finally will they insure it?  because you have to insurance which specifically states that it covers the property being rented out.

I had an empty house on my hands once when my ex husband did a runner, after the divorce but before he had re-mortgaged the house (he couldn't get one and I was too kind hearted - but that was then).

I looked into renting it, I couldn't.  1) because I didn't have the ex's permission, 2) because the boiler while 'safe' did not meet the standards for rented properties, 3) the mortgage company won't give you permission if there are arrears, and finally 4) the insurance would also have cost me a small fortune in the area it was in (not good).

I couldn't sell the house either because I couldn't find the ex to give permission for the sale...  That little phrase on the joint mortgage application 'jointly and severally liable' is a real stinger.  They didn't know where he was so as they knew where I was they came after me for all the debt he had run up.

Aaaaah life, isn't it wonderful?

Xtremeteam:
yawn  :roll:

rangerider:

--- Quote from: "Karen696" ---Mmmmm, this raises a few interesting points - does that mean they (the government) will undertake to make the house 'fit' for rental?  Will they okay it with the mortgage company - who can refuse you permission to rent it (often a reason why the house is empty) and finally will they insure it?  because you have to insurance which specifically states that it covers the property being rented out.
--- End quote ---



Last I read, is that the government would make it fit for rental at the owners expense, and make good at the end of tenancy. Most LA tenancys are assured though, that means little can be done to push anyone out, and as long as the rent is paid (which it will be by benefit) you can stay for eternity and descendants have a right of occupation too.

I also suspect its very much "force Majure" legislation, which means tough waste products to the mortgage co and any one else too.

Bob696:
For homeless read asylum seekers.

Sider, I have been sat here trying to think of a polite way to say this but I cant. So, please shut up you are starting to sound like a jerk.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page