Chat & Social > The Bar - General Chat
Sad sad sad sad sad sad sad .... *sigh*
Mace:
--- Quote from: "Thrasher" ---However ... can only find 2,570kg as a weight for the 4.4 - no weight given for the 4.2SC (which I assume is heavier as the spec is higher and the interior is different...) - and I used the gross before (doh!) which is 3050kg.
--- End quote ---
http://www.whatcar.co.uk/car-review-performance.aspx?RT=418&ED=47098&U=0
2483kg .... what car quote the same for both models !!!
woody:
--- Quote from: "Mace" ---
--- Quote from: "Thrasher" ---Mace...bit baffled - freedom of choice is fine. Why LIE about something tho?
--- End quote ---
Because that's what people do Neil. So you now want to take away someones freedom to lie? or is it you just don't understand why people lie? Doesn't make them any less human than you or I.
--- End quote ---
people who lie are a**h*les
people who lie well are politicians :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Thrasher:
I got my figures from Land Rover ;-)
But then.....
davidlandy:
hmmm..
not sure what the power outputs of Jimbobs motor is as its been tweaked - but its quicker to 60 than the book says and the numbers being quoted above. he is 'in' with the scooby and Evo lads and all they do try to get the edge on each other for speed!!!! even somehow get extra speed by putting sparkplugs in the exhaust tail pipes to spit flames at the opposition!!!
rahter than just start to complicate things with power to weight ratios just let the test track decide! these are two very different motors, if the RR lost even at the same weight there would then be debbate over gear ratios, bhp lost thru tranmissions, aerodynamics...etc..etc..
Thrasher:
Aerodynamics - Land Rover
Now THAT is an Oxymoron ;-)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version